Difference between revisions of "Friedland09.BornFerg"
(→Example A: Intro to BF Method) |
(→Example A: Intro to BF Method) |
||
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
:{| class='wikitable' | :{| class='wikitable' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | || '''BF weight for reported development ultimate''': ''z = %reported = 1 - 1/CDF | + | || '''BF weight for reported development ultimate''': ''z = %reported = 1 - 1/CDF'' |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 18:51, 2 July 2020
Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.
Chapter 9: Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method
Contents
Pop Quiz
Study Tips
BattleTable
Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:
- fact A...
- fact B...
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d) E (2019.Spring #17) ultimate:
- reported B-Fultimate:
- reported B-Fcombining data:
- argument againstE (2019.Spring #19) Friedland07.Development ultimate:
- reported B-F (tort reform)E (2018.Spring #17) E (2018.Spring #19) E (2017.Spring #18) Friedland08.ExpectedClms unpaid & IBNR:
- reported B-FE (2016.Fall #21) IBNR:
- B-F methodECR assumption:
- assess reasonablenessalternate method:
- recommend & justifyE (2016.Spring #16) Friedland08.ExpectedClms Friedland07.Development ultimate:
- paid B-FE (2015.Fall #18) ultimate:
- reported B-FCDFs < 1.0:
- does B-F still work?E (2015.Spring #19) ultimate:
- reported B-Fselected ultimates:
- discuss appropriatenessultimate:
- Benktanderunpaid:
- explain Benktander iterationsE (2014.Fall #18) IBNR:
- Benktandercredibility weighting:
- explain BenktanderE (2014.Spring #14) ultimate:
- reported B-Frptd B-F vs rptd dvlpt:
- situations where equalrptd B-F vs rptd dvlpt:
- situations B-F is betterE (2013.Fall #17) unpaid:
- Benktanderunpaid:
- Benktander 1000 iterationsE (2013.Spring #4) ultimate:
- reported B-FE (2013.Spring #18) key assumption:
- B-F methodcredibility-weighting:
- explain for B-Fcredibility-weighting:
- violation of assumption(d) paid vs rptd B-F for rising LRs
(e) B-F vs Cape Cod
In Plain English!
Example A: Intro to BF Method
Calculate the ultimate for AY 2023 using the reported Bornhuetter-Ferguson method. The following information is as of Dec 31, 2023:
EP 1,000 ECR 65% reported claims12 375 reported CDF12→ult 2.0
First, note how easy it is to calculate the ultimate using the reported development method:
- UltrDev 375 x 2.0 = 750
And the ultimate for the ECR method is equally easy:
- UltECR65% x 1,000 = 650
The reported BF method is just a weighted average of these where the weight, z, given to the reported development method is:
BF weight for reported development ultimate: z = %reported = 1 - 1/CDF
(There's also a paid version of BF and it works exactly like the reported version.)