Difference between revisions of "Friedland15.Evaluation"

From CAS Exam 5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(BattleTable)
(BattleTable)
Line 93: Line 93:
 
|| [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Exam_(2016_1-Spring)/(2016_1-Spring)_(24).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2016.Spring #24)'''</span>
 
|| [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Exam_(2016_1-Spring)/(2016_1-Spring)_(24).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2016.Spring #24)'''</span>
 
|| '''actual vs expected''': <br> - rptd claim emergence
 
|| '''actual vs expected''': <br> - rptd claim emergence
||  
+
|| '''actual vs expected''': <br> - actuary's reactions
 
| style="background-color: lightgrey;" |  
 
| style="background-color: lightgrey;" |  
 
| style="background-color: lightgrey;" |  
 
| style="background-color: lightgrey;" |  

Revision as of 19:48, 2 July 2020

Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.

Chapter 15: Evaluation of Methods

Pop Quiz

Keywords

BattleTable

Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:

  • fact A...
  • fact B...
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d)
E (2019.Fall #25) expected paid claims:
- calculate
unpaid estimate:
- recommendation
E (2018.Spring #24)
E (2018.Spring #26)
E (2017.Fall #27) assess method:
- paid & rptd devlpt
assess method:
- Freq-Sev, rptd BF
assess method:
- paid devlpt, paid BF
E (2017.Fall #28) assess CDFs:
- devlpt, BF, Freq-Sev
assess ECR:
- BF method
E (2017.Spring #21) identify scenario:
- consistent with results
identify scenario:
- explains difference
alternate method:
- for part (a)
alternate method:
- for part (b)
E (2017.Spring #26) assess ECR:
- BF method
method comparison:
to Benktander
investigating results:
- questions for mgmt 1
E (2016.Fall #16) Friedland05.Triangles Friedland05.Triangles Friedland06.Diagnostics select method:
- settlement rate change
E (2016.Fall #18) BF ECR:
- calculate
unpaid:
- 2 methods & justify
assess methods:
- ECR, paid BF, paid devlpt
E (2016.Fall #27) actual vs expected:
- claim count emergence
actual vs expected:
- identify limitation
E (2016.Spring #24) actual vs expected:
- rptd claim emergence
actual vs expected:
- actuary's reactions
E (2016.Spring #25)
E (2015.Fall #19) impact/solution:
- long development pattern
impact/solution:
- tort reform
impact/solution:
- higher deductibles
impact/solution:
- faster claims processing
E (2015.Fall #22)
E (2015.Fall #25)
E (2014.Fall #19)
E (2014.Fall #22)
E (2014.Fall #24)
E (2014.Spring #17)
E (2014.Spring #22)
E (2013.Fall #18)
E (2013.Fall #24)
E (2013.Spring #21)
E (2013.Spring #22)
E (2013.Spring #26)


 : 1 See Friedland04.Meetings for potential questions.

In Plain English!

POP QUIZ ANSWERS