Difference between revisions of "Friedland17.ULAE"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→BattleTable) |
(→BattleTable) |
||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
|| '''assess impact''': <br> - on ULAE Johnson method | || '''assess impact''': <br> - on ULAE Johnson method | ||
|| '''assess impact''': <br> - on rates using PP method | || '''assess impact''': <br> - on rates using PP method | ||
| − | || '''assess impact''': <br> - reinsurance recoverable | + | || '''assess impact''': <br> - on reinsurance recoverable |
|- | |- | ||
|| [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Exam_(2013_1-Spring)/(2013_1-Spring)_(25).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2013.Spring #25)'''</span> | || [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Exam_(2013_1-Spring)/(2013_1-Spring)_(25).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2013.Spring #25)'''</span> | ||
| − | || | + | || '''Kittel refinement''': <br> - unpaid ULAE |
| − | || | + | || '''Kittel refinement''': <br> - purpose |
| − | || | + | || '''classical method''': <br> - shortcoming |
| − | || | + | | style='background-color: lightgrey;' | |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 01:13, 6 January 2020
Chapter 17: Estimating ULAE (UnAllocated Claim Adjustment Expenses)
Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.
Study Tips
BattleTable
Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:
- fact A...
- fact B...
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d) E (2019.Fall #24) Kittel refinement
- unpaid ULAEcalculation changes:
* clms-made → occurrenceE (2018.Fall #22) IBNYR claims:
- calculateany method:
- unpaid ULAEE (2018.Spring #23) classical technique:
- unpaid ULAEKittel refinement:
- unpaid ULAEcompare techniques:
- classical vs KittelE (2017.Fall #26) classical technique:
- unpaid ULAEcalculate ratio:
→ (pd ULAE)/(pd claims)assess reasonableness:
- ULAE estimateE (2017.Spring #24) ULAE scenario:
- expanding operationsULAE scenario:
- hurricane riskULAE scenario:
- long-tail lineE (2016.Fall #26) classical technique:
- unpaid ULAEclassical technique:
- assumption violationKittel refinement:
- assess appropriatenessE (2016.Spring #22) ALAE development:
- unpaid ALAEclassical technique:
- unpaid ULAEassess reasonableness:
- ULAE estimateE (2015.Spring #25) classical technique:
- identify problemKittel refinement:
- unpaid ULAEE (2014.Fall #23) B-F method:
- claims IBNRclassical technique:
- unpaid ULAEclassical technique:
- assess assumptionsKittel refinement:
- describeE (2013.Fall #19) assess impact:
- on ALAE ratio methodassess impact:
- on ULAE Johnson methodassess impact:
- on rates using PP methodassess impact:
- on reinsurance recoverableE (2013.Spring #25) Kittel refinement:
- unpaid ULAEKittel refinement:
- purposeclassical method:
- shortcoming