Difference between revisions of "Friedland10.CapeCod"

From CAS Exam 5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(In Plain English!)
(Example xxxx: A Hard Problem)
Line 92: Line 92:
  
 
* they don't give you the rate level adjustment factors directly – you need knowledge of the pricing material to calculate them yourself
 
* they don't give you the rate level adjustment factors directly – you need knowledge of the pricing material to calculate them yourself
* they don't give the CDFs ''(Cumulative Development Factors)'' – you have to calculate them yourself from the data triangle but there's a very trick catch because you first have to adjust the triangle to take into account the tort reform
+
* they don't give the CDFs ''(Cumulative Development Factors)'' – you have to calculate them yourself from the data triangle but it's very tricky because you first have to adjust the triangle to take into account the tort reform
 +
 
 +
Give it a try before you watch the video.
  
 
===CC Method Concepts===
 
===CC Method Concepts===

Revision as of 16:23, 15 July 2020

Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.

Chapter 10: Cape Cod Method

Pop Quiz

Study Tips

BattleTable

Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:

  • fact A...
  • fact B...
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d)
E (2019.Fall #19) ultimate claims:
- reported Cape Cod
E (2019.Spring #18) ultimate claims:
- reported Cape Cod
identify scenario:
- paid CC works better
E (2018.Spring #8)
E (2017.Fall #21) ultimate:
- Cape Cod
E (2017.Spring #23) ultimate:
- paid devlpt
ultimate:
- Cape Cod
E (2016.Spring #18) Cape Cod vs B-F:
- compare
Cape Cod vs B-F:
- adjustments to rptd loss
Cape Cod vs B-F:
- adjustments to EP
court decision:
- suggest better method
E (2015.Spring #17) IBNR:
- Cape Code adjustments
E (2014.Spring #15) IBNR:
- B-F
IBNR:
- Cape Cod
B-F vs Cape Cod:
- rising claims, thin data
E (2013.Fall #20) IBNR:
- Cape Cod

In Plain English!

Example xxxx: A Hard Problem

Once you understand the basic version of the CC method, here's a harder problem for you to try. It's harder for 2 reasons:

  • they don't give you the rate level adjustment factors directly – you need knowledge of the pricing material to calculate them yourself
  • they don't give the CDFs (Cumulative Development Factors) – you have to calculate them yourself from the data triangle but it's very tricky because you first have to adjust the triangle to take into account the tort reform

Give it a try before you watch the video.

CC Method Concepts

  • similar to BF - difference is in how ECR is chosen
    • BF uses results of ECR method (incorporates judgment)
    • CC uses a formula (no judgment involved)
  • often use in reinsurance (why?)
  • assumption: unreported claims will develop based on expected claims
  • ads:
    • uses reported claims in the calculation of the ECR, therefore it will respond (at least partially) to changes in claims ratios
    • (note that if the CR changes over time, increases or decreases, then this trend may not be reflected in the CC formula for ECR)
  • disads:
    • dependent on the availability and accuracy of the rate level adjustment factor (can use without adjusting for CRL but then lose accuracy)
    • thin data increases volatility (should then use BF because we can incorporate judgment)

POP QUIZ ANSWERS