Friedland09.BornFerg

From CAS Exam 5
Revision as of 13:08, 3 July 2020 by 66.248.200.4 (talk) (Example A: Intro to BF Method)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.

Chapter 9: Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method

Pop Quiz

Study Tips

BattleTable

Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:

  • fact A...
  • fact B...
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d)
E (2019.Spring #17) ultimate:
- reported B-F
ultimate:
- reported B-F
combining data:
- argument against
E (2019.Spring #19) Friedland07.Development ultimate:
- reported B-F (tort reform)
E (2018.Spring #17)
E (2018.Spring #19)
E (2017.Spring #18) Friedland08.ExpectedClms unpaid & IBNR:
- reported B-F
E (2016.Fall #21) IBNR:
- B-F method
ECR assumption:
- assess reasonableness
alternate method:
- recommend & justify
E (2016.Spring #16) Friedland08.ExpectedClms Friedland07.Development ultimate:
- paid B-F
E (2015.Fall #18) ultimate:
- reported B-F
CDFs < 1.0:
- does B-F still work?
E (2015.Spring #19) ultimate:
- reported B-F
selected ultimates:
- discuss appropriateness
ultimate:
- Benktander
unpaid:
- explain Benktander iterations
E (2014.Fall #18) IBNR:
- Benktander
credibility weighting:
- explain Benktander
E (2014.Spring #14) ultimate:
- reported B-F
rptd B-F vs rptd dvlpt:
- situations where equal
rptd B-F vs rptd dvlpt:
- situations B-F is better
E (2013.Fall #17) unpaid:
- Benktander
unpaid:
- Benktander 1000 iterations
E (2013.Spring #4) ultimate:
- reported B-F
E (2013.Spring #18) key assumption:
- B-F method
credibility-weighting:
- explain for B-F
credibility-weighting:
- violation of assumption
(d) paid vs rptd B-F for rising LRs
(e) B-F vs Cape Cod

In Plain English!

Example A: Intro to BF Method

The following information is as of Dec 31, 2023. Calculate the ultimate for AY 2023 using the reported Bornhuetter-Ferguson method.

EP 1,000
ECR 65%
reported claims12 375
reported CDF12→ult 1.4

First, note how easy it is to calculate the ultimate using the reported development method:

  • Ultr-Dev   =   375 x 2.0   =   750

And the ultimate for the ECR method is equally easy:

  • UltECR   =   65% x 1,000   =   650

The reported BF method is just a weighted average of these where the weight, z, given to the reported development method is:

z   =   %reported   =   1 – 1/CDF

So,

  • z   =   1 – 1/CDF12→ult   =   1 – 1/1.4   =   0.286

and therefore,

  • Ultr-BF   =   [ 0.286 x 750 ] + [ (1 – 0.286) x 650 ]   =   679

Actually, there's a simpler but equivalent formula for the BF ultimate:

Ultr-BF   =   (reported claims) + %unreported x UltECR


(There's also a paid version of BF and it works exactly like the reported version.)

POP QUIZ ANSWERS