Difference between revisions of "Friedland11.FreqSev"

From CAS Exam 5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Example A: Intro to FS Methods)
(Example A: Intro to FS Methods)
Line 183: Line 183:
  
 
This is because if you multiply the counts by the severity, the counts cancel out and the result is losses.
 
This is because if you multiply the counts by the severity, the counts cancel out and the result is losses.
 +
 +
===Example B: FS Methods - Developing Counts and Severities===
 +
 +
Let's build on the idea from the previous section.
  
 
==POP QUIZ ANSWERS==
 
==POP QUIZ ANSWERS==

Revision as of 17:47, 18 July 2020

Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.

Chapter 11: Frequency-Severity Methods

Pop Quiz

Study Tips

BattleTable

Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:

  • fact A...
  • disposal rate method - calculate ultimate/unpaid amounts with trending and adjustments for court decisions
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d)
E (2019.Fall #20) disposal rate method:
- unpaid
Freq/Sev vs Paid Devlpt:
- why Freq/Sev better
E (2019.Spring #15) unpaid claims:
- freq-sev method
identify scenario:
- rptd claims down
E (2019.Spring #20) tail severity:
- provide an estimate
tail severity:
- selection of maturity age
E (2018.Spring #18)
E (2017.Fall #18) ultimate:
- Freq-Sev method
trend in counts:
- explain
seasonality:
- suggest diagnostic
E (2017.Fall #20) ultimate frequency:
- select & justify
ultimate severity:
- select & justify
ultimate:
- B-F & Freq-Sev methods
E (2017.Fall #23) tail severity:
- provide an estimate
tail severity:
- selection of maturity age
E (2017.Spring #16) IBNR:
- Freq-Sev method
ads/disads:
- Freq-Sev method
E (2017.Spring #17) ultimate:
- Freq-Sev method
E (2016.Fall #20) disposal rates - good:
- Freq-Sev method
disposal rates - not good:
- Freq-Sev method
adjustments:
- to Freq-Sev method
E (2016.Fall #22) settlement rate change:
- provide evidence
ultimate:
- Freq-Sev method
E (2016.Spring #19) does Freq-Sev work?:
- long-tailed lines
does Freq-Sev work?:
- many reopened claims
does Freq-Sev work?:
- spike in high-severity clms
does Freq-Sev work?:
- change in case reserving
E (2015.Fall #20) does Freq-Sev work?:
- general liability
does Freq-Sev work?:
- reduced deductibles
unpaid claim estimate:
- suggest improvement
E (2015.Spring #20) ultimate:
- use several methods
do methods work:
- discuss
E (2015.Spring #21) disposal rate method:
- ultimate
disposal rate method:
- adjust for severity spike
E (2014.Fall #16) estimate of counts:
- assess reasonableness
E (2014.Fall #17) disposal rate method:
- unpaid
legislative reform:
- assess impact
E (2014.Spring #16) ultimate counts:
- reins. attachment points
E (2013.Fall #16) IBNR:
- Freq-Sev method
E (2013.Spring #19) IBNR:
- Freq-Sev method

In Plain English!

Example A: Intro to FS Methods

Alice likes to use "FS" as an abbreviation for Frequency-Severity so we'll follow her lead. The concept behind FS methods is super-simple. Recall:

frequency = counts /exposures
severity = losses / counts

I'm going to use the term "losses" in this chapter, not "claims". (The reason is that it's too easy to get "claims" confused with "counts") So, we'll refer to losses and counts. Recall also that in practice paid counts usually means the same thing as closed counts. That ignores the possibility of partial payments where a claim could be paid but not technically closed, but let's agree for our purposes here that paid & closed mean the same thing.

The simplest possible example of the FS method is this:

  • ultimate counts for AY 2025 = 100
  • ultimate severity for AY 2025 = $2,000

Then,

  • ultimate loss for AY 2025 = 100 x $2,000 = $200,000.

This is because if you multiply the counts by the severity, the counts cancel out and the result is losses.

Example B: FS Methods - Developing Counts and Severities

Let's build on the idea from the previous section.

POP QUIZ ANSWERS