Difference between revisions of "Friedland11.FreqSev"
(→Example B: FS Methods - Developing Counts and Severities) |
(→Example B: FS Methods - Developing Counts and Severities) |
||
| Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
: [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Exam_(2019_1-Spring)/(2019_1-Spring)_(15).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2019.Spring #15)'''</span> | : [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Exam_(2019_1-Spring)/(2019_1-Spring)_(15).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2019.Spring #15)'''</span> | ||
| − | : [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Friedland.Ch14_(16F.24).pdf <span style="color: white; font-size: 12px; background-color: orchid; border: solid; border-width: 2px; border-radius: 10px; border-color: orchid; padding: 1px 3px 1px 3px; margin: 0px;">'''''Solution: | + | : [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Friedland.Ch14_(16F.24).pdf <span style="color: white; font-size: 12px; background-color: orchid; border: solid; border-width: 2px; border-radius: 10px; border-color: orchid; padding: 1px 3px 1px 3px; margin: 0px;">'''''Solution: 2019.Spring #15'''''</span>] |
| − | : [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Friedland.Ch14_(SS)_practice_02_03.pdf <span style="color: white; font-size: 12px; background-color: green; border: solid; border-width: 2px; border-radius: 10px; border-color: green; padding: 1px 3px 1px 3px; margin: 0px;">'''''Practice: 2 problems like | + | : [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Friedland.Ch14_(SS)_practice_02_03.pdf <span style="color: white; font-size: 12px; background-color: green; border: solid; border-width: 2px; border-radius: 10px; border-color: green; padding: 1px 3px 1px 3px; margin: 0px;">'''''Practice: 2 problems like 2019.Spring #15'''''</span>] |
| + | |||
| + | Since Alice has been through all of this before, she has a couple of pro tips for you: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :{| class='wikitable' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | || '''Alice's Pro Tip for Maximizing Exam Score''': For reserving questions, pay attention to whether they ask for <u>ultimate</u> or <u>unpaid</u> amounts. | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | :{| class='wikitable' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | || '''Alice's Pro Tip for Optimal Time Management''': You are usually asked about 1 specific AY. Save time by doing only the calculations you need for that AY. | ||
| + | |} | ||
==POP QUIZ ANSWERS== | ==POP QUIZ ANSWERS== | ||
Revision as of 18:55, 18 July 2020
Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.
Chapter 11: Frequency-Severity Methods
Contents
Pop Quiz
Study Tips
BattleTable
Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:
- fact A...
- disposal rate method - calculate ultimate/unpaid amounts with trending and adjustments for court decisions
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d) E (2019.Fall #20) disposal rate method:
- unpaidFreq/Sev vs Paid Devlpt:
- why Freq/Sev betterE (2019.Spring #15) unpaid claims:
- freq-sev methodidentify scenario:
- rptd claims downE (2019.Spring #20) tail severity:
- provide an estimatetail severity:
- selection of maturity ageE (2018.Spring #18) E (2017.Fall #18) ultimate:
- Freq-Sev methodtrend in counts:
- explainseasonality:
- suggest diagnosticE (2017.Fall #20) ultimate frequency:
- select & justifyultimate severity:
- select & justifyultimate:
- B-F & Freq-Sev methodsE (2017.Fall #23) tail severity:
- provide an estimatetail severity:
- selection of maturity ageE (2017.Spring #16) IBNR:
- Freq-Sev methodads/disads:
- Freq-Sev methodE (2017.Spring #17) ultimate:
- Freq-Sev methodE (2016.Fall #20) disposal rates - good:
- Freq-Sev methoddisposal rates - not good:
- Freq-Sev methodadjustments:
- to Freq-Sev methodE (2016.Fall #22) settlement rate change:
- provide evidenceultimate:
- Freq-Sev methodE (2016.Spring #19) does Freq-Sev work?:
- long-tailed linesdoes Freq-Sev work?:
- many reopened claimsdoes Freq-Sev work?:
- spike in high-severity clmsdoes Freq-Sev work?:
- change in case reservingE (2015.Fall #20) does Freq-Sev work?:
- general liabilitydoes Freq-Sev work?:
- reduced deductiblesunpaid claim estimate:
- suggest improvementE (2015.Spring #20) ultimate:
- use several methodsdo methods work:
- discussE (2015.Spring #21) disposal rate method:
- ultimatedisposal rate method:
- adjust for severity spikeE (2014.Fall #16) estimate of counts:
- assess reasonablenessE (2014.Fall #17) disposal rate method:
- unpaidlegislative reform:
- assess impactE (2014.Spring #16) ultimate counts:
- reins. attachment pointsE (2013.Fall #16) IBNR:
- Freq-Sev methodE (2013.Spring #19) IBNR:
- Freq-Sev method
In Plain English!
Example A: Intro to FS Methods
Alice likes to use "FS" as an abbreviation for Frequency-Severity so we'll follow her lead. The concept behind FS methods is super-simple. Recall:
- frequency = counts /exposures
- severity = losses / counts
I'm going to use the term "losses" in this chapter, not "claims". (The reason is that it's too easy to get "claims" confused with "counts") So, we'll refer to losses and counts. Recall also that in practice paid counts usually means the same thing as closed counts. That ignores the possibility of partial payments where a claim could be paid but not technically closed, but let's agree for our purposes here that paid & closed mean the same thing.
The simplest possible example of the FS method is this:
- ultimate counts for AY 2025 = 100
- ultimate severity for AY 2025 = $2,000
Then,
- ultimate loss for AY 2025 = 100 x $2,000 = $200,000.
This is because if you multiply the counts by the severity, the counts cancel out and the result is losses.
Example B: FS Methods - Developing Counts and Severities
Let's build on the idea from the previous section. Instead of being given the ultimate count and ultimate severity directly, you have to go back 1 step and start with the reported count and reported loss triangles. Here are the steps, but you could probably guess without being told:
- develop counts to ultimate
- calculate the severity triangle as losses/counts
- develop the severities to ultimate
- calculate the ultimate loss as (ultimate count) x (ultimate severity)
That's all there is to it. There's really nothing new - it's just an application of the development method to a triangle of severities. Here's an exam problem based on this idea along with Alice's solution.
- E (2019.Spring #15)
Since Alice has been through all of this before, she has a couple of pro tips for you:
Alice's Pro Tip for Maximizing Exam Score: For reserving questions, pay attention to whether they ask for ultimate or unpaid amounts.
Alice's Pro Tip for Optimal Time Management: You are usually asked about 1 specific AY. Save time by doing only the calculations you need for that AY.