Difference between revisions of "Friedland11.FreqSev"

From CAS Exam 5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(BattleTable)
(BattleTable)
Line 106: Line 106:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|| [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Exam_(2015_1-Spring)/(2015_1-Spring)_(20).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2015.Spring #20)'''</span>
 
|| [https://www.battleacts5.ca/pdf/Exam_(2015_1-Spring)/(2015_1-Spring)_(20).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2015.Spring #20)'''</span>
||  
+
|| '''ultimate''': <br> - use several methods
||  
+
|| '''appropriateness of methods''': <br> - discuss
||
+
| style="background-color: lightgrey;" |  
||
+
| style="background-color: lightgrey;" |  
  
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 15:32, 1 July 2020

Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.

Chapter 11: Frequency-Severity Methods

Pop Quiz

Keywords

BattleTable

Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:

  • fact A...
  • fact B...
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d)
E (2019.Spring #15) unpaid claims:
- freq-sev method
identify scenario:
- rptd claims down
E (2019.Spring #20) tail severity:
- provide an estimate
tail severity:
- selection of maturity age
E (2018.Spring #18)
E (2017.Fall #18) ultimate:
- Freq-Sev method
trend in counts:
- explain
seasonality:
- suggest diagnostic
E (2017.Fall #20) ultimate frequency:
- select & justify
ultimate severity:
- select & justify
ultimate:
- B-F & Freq-Sev methods
E (2017.Fall #23) tail severity:
- provide an estimate
tail severity:
- selection of maturity age
E (2017.Spring #16) IBNR:
- Freq-Sev method
ads/disads:
- Freq-Sev method
E (2017.Spring #17) ultimate:
- Freq-Sev method
E (2016.Fall #20) disposal rates - good:
- Freq-Sev method
disposal rates - not good:
- Freq-Sev method
adjustments:
- to Freq-Sev method
E (2016.Fall #22) settlement rate change:
- provide evidence
ultimate:
- Freq-Sev method
E (2016.Spring #19) does Freq-Sev work?:
- long-tailed lines
does Freq-Sev work?:
- many reopened claims
does Freq-Sev work?:
- spike in high-severity clms
does Freq-Sev work?:
- change in case reserving
E (2015.Fall #20) does Freq-Sev work?:
- general liability
does Freq-Sev work?:
- reduced deductibles
unpaid claim estimate:
- suggest improvement
E (2015.Spring #20) ultimate:
- use several methods
appropriateness of methods:
- discuss
E (2015.Spring #21)
E (2014.Fall #16)
E (2014.Fall #17)
E (2014.Spring #16)
E (2013.Fall #16)
E (2013.Spring #19)

In Plain English!

POP QUIZ ANSWERS