Difference between revisions of "Friedland12.CaseOS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Keywords) |
(→In Plain English!) |
||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
==In Plain English!== | ==In Plain English!== | ||
+ | There are 2 case O/S ''(case outstanding)'' methods and we discuss the hard method first, which normally wouldn't be logical. The reason we do this is that method #1 appears first in the source text but also because it appears more frequently on the exam than method #2. You'll see that the 2 methods are not really related, other than that they both used case O/S data in some way, so there's no advantage in covering the easy method first. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Case O/S Method #1 (Hard Method)=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Case O/S Method #2 (Easy Method)=== | ||
==POP QUIZ ANSWERS== | ==POP QUIZ ANSWERS== |
Revision as of 20:10, 29 July 2020
Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.
Chapter 12: Case Outstanding Development Method
Contents
Pop Quiz
Study Tips
BattleTable
Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:
- fact A...
- fact B...
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d) E (2019.Fall #18) unpaid:
- case O/S methodscenario where it works:
- case O/S methodE (2017.Fall #22) unpaid:
- case O/S methodidentify limitations:
- in method for part (a)E (2017.Spring #19) expctd incremental clms:
- rptd devlpt methodexpctd incremental clms:
- paid to prior case O/SRY versus AY:
- case O/S methodE (2016.Fall #19) unpaid:
- case O/S methodindustry benchmarks:
- reasonable?unpaid estimate:
- reasonable?E (2016.Spring #17) unpaid:
- case O/S methodCase O/S method:
-appropriate for part (a)?E (2014.Spring #23) cumulative % rptd:
- calculateunpaid:
- case O/S methodE (2013.Spring #17) unpaid:
- case O/S methodidentify limitations:
- case O/S methodscenario where it works:
- case O/S method
In Plain English!
There are 2 case O/S (case outstanding) methods and we discuss the hard method first, which normally wouldn't be logical. The reason we do this is that method #1 appears first in the source text but also because it appears more frequently on the exam than method #2. You'll see that the 2 methods are not really related, other than that they both used case O/S data in some way, so there's no advantage in covering the easy method first.