Difference between revisions of "Friedland12.CaseOS"

From CAS Exam 5
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Keywords)
(In Plain English!)
Line 73: Line 73:
 
==In Plain English!==
 
==In Plain English!==
  
 +
There are 2 case O/S ''(case outstanding)'' methods and we discuss the hard method first, which normally wouldn't be logical. The reason we do this is that method #1 appears first in the source text but also because it appears more frequently on the exam than method #2. You'll see that the 2 methods are not really related, other than that they both used case O/S data in some way, so there's no advantage in covering the easy method first.
 +
 +
===Case O/S Method #1 (Hard Method)===
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
===Case O/S Method #2 (Easy Method)===
  
 
==POP QUIZ ANSWERS==
 
==POP QUIZ ANSWERS==

Revision as of 20:10, 29 July 2020

Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.

Chapter 12: Case Outstanding Development Method

Pop Quiz

Study Tips

BattleTable

Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:

  • fact A...
  • fact B...
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d)
E (2019.Fall #18) unpaid:
- case O/S method
scenario where it works:
- case O/S method
E (2017.Fall #22) unpaid:
- case O/S method
identify limitations:
- in method for part (a)
E (2017.Spring #19) expctd incremental clms:
- rptd devlpt method
expctd incremental clms:
- paid to prior case O/S
RY versus AY:
- case O/S method
E (2016.Fall #19) unpaid:
- case O/S method
industry benchmarks:
- reasonable?
unpaid estimate:
- reasonable?
E (2016.Spring #17) unpaid:
- case O/S method
Case O/S method:
-appropriate for part (a)?
E (2014.Spring #23) cumulative % rptd:
- calculate
unpaid:
- case O/S method
E (2013.Spring #17) unpaid:
- case O/S method
identify limitations:
- case O/S method
scenario where it works:
- case O/S method

In Plain English!

There are 2 case O/S (case outstanding) methods and we discuss the hard method first, which normally wouldn't be logical. The reason we do this is that method #1 appears first in the source text but also because it appears more frequently on the exam than method #2. You'll see that the 2 methods are not really related, other than that they both used case O/S data in some way, so there's no advantage in covering the easy method first.

Case O/S Method #1 (Hard Method)

Case O/S Method #2 (Easy Method)

POP QUIZ ANSWERS