Difference between revisions of "Friedland13.BerqSherm"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Pop Quiz) |
(→Pop Quiz) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* What are the <u>best</u> 3 diagnostic triangles to look at for evidence of changes in case reserve adequacy. (Hint: See ''[[Friedland06.Diagnostics#Changes_in_Case_Reserve_Adequacy | Chapter 6 (Diagnostics) - Changes in Case Reserve Adequacy]]'') | * What are the <u>best</u> 3 diagnostic triangles to look at for evidence of changes in case reserve adequacy. (Hint: See ''[[Friedland06.Diagnostics#Changes_in_Case_Reserve_Adequacy | Chapter 6 (Diagnostics) - Changes in Case Reserve Adequacy]]'') | ||
* What are the <u>best</u> 3 diagnostic triangles to look at for evidence of claims settlement rates. [Hint: See ''[[Friedland06.Diagnostics#Changes_in_Settlement_Rate | Chapter 6 (Diagnostics) - Changes in Settlement Rate]]'') | * What are the <u>best</u> 3 diagnostic triangles to look at for evidence of claims settlement rates. [Hint: See ''[[Friedland06.Diagnostics#Changes_in_Settlement_Rate | Chapter 6 (Diagnostics) - Changes in Settlement Rate]]'') | ||
+ | |||
+ | <span style="background-color: lightblue; border-radius: 5px;"> ''[[Friedland13.Data#POP_QUIZ_ANSWERS |Click for Answer]]'' </span> | ||
==Study Tips== | ==Study Tips== |
Revision as of 15:55, 1 August 2020
Reading: Friedland, J.F., Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques, Casualty Actuarial Society, Third Version, July 2010. The Appendices are excluded.
Chapter 13: Berquist-Sherman Methods
Pop Quiz
- What are the best 3 diagnostic triangles to look at for evidence of changes in case reserve adequacy. (Hint: See Chapter 6 (Diagnostics) - Changes in Case Reserve Adequacy)
- What are the best 3 diagnostic triangles to look at for evidence of claims settlement rates. [Hint: See Chapter 6 (Diagnostics) - Changes in Settlement Rate)
Study Tips
BattleTable
Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:
- reported Berquist-Sherman method - calculate ultimate / unpaid / IBNR
- paid Berquist-Sherman method - calculate ultimate / unpaid / IBNR
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d) E (2019.Fall #21) reported BS:
- calc unpaidE (2019.Spring #14) accuracy of paid devlpt:
- evaluateE (2019.Spring #22) reported BS:
- calc ultimateE (2018.Spring #21) E (2017.Fall #24) reported BS:
- calc IBNRalternate method:
- propose & justifyE (2017.Spring #22) paid BS
- claim count adjustmentE (2016.Fall #23) reported BS, BF
- calc unpaidE (2016.Spring #20) paid BS
- calc ultimateE (2016.Spring #21) Friedland06.Diagnostics ultimate:
- suggest methodE (2015.Fall #21) paid BS
- disposal ratepaid BS
- distortionE (2015.Spring #22) impact:
- settlement rate changeresponse:
- to settlement rate changerelated methods:
- rptd B-S, rptd devlptE (2015.Spring #23) evaluate methods:
- paid & rptd devlptadjustment to method:
- propose & justifyE (2014.Fall #20) reported BS, paid BS
- calc ultimateE (2014.Spring #18) ultimate:
- select & apply 2 methodsE (2013.Fall #6) reported BS:
- calc ultimate 1E (2013.Fall #21) paid BS
- calc ultimateE (2013.Fall #23) operational change:
- explaininvestigating the change:
- questions for clms mgmt 2diagnostics:
- to check results 3E (2013.Spring #23) reported BS:
- adjust rptd trianglecompare IBNR:
adjusted vs unadjusted
- 1 This question requires knowledge of pricing. You may need to come back to it later if you haven't covered the pricing material yet.
- 2 See Chapter 4 - Meetings for potential questions.
- 3 Review Chapter 6 - Diagnostics but note that valid answers can include diagnostics other than those specifically discussed in chapter 6.